An apologist needs to actually condone the behaviour of the person they're defending. I've done no such thing. What a silly label to put on someone in the first place.

Your conclusion that all of his fans are just weak-minded really hasn't been thought through very well. That's a really narrow view to look at this view. Honestly, you seem to be too blinded by hate to think clearly.

Once upon a time, it was "offensive" to claim that the world was round. Potentially offensive speech is how we evolve as a society, shutting it down stunts our growth. You're supposed to allow people to speak dangerous ideas, and let the ideas die in a marketplace of free speech. Not censor or ban them, and most certainly not put people in prison for them.

Are you not the least bit concerned that different corporations, in different sectors all banned him at the exact same time? For nothing more than allegations of crimes, with no actual evidence of the crimes committed?

A lot of people claim that Tate has helped them improve their lives, saved them from depression and even suicide. But I suppose it's more convenient to ignore these people, as it doesn't fit with your narrative.