You don’t have to reply to this because the conversation will go on all day, but have lots of criticisms about your explanation.

If women’s lack of sympathy for men comes from what OTHER men did historically, this makes no sense. A man in his 20’s today has nothing to do the historical suffering of women, and neither does a woman in her 20’s today.

And when you refer to “white men having it all”, i ask: which white men? And when?

Are you talking about eastern European white men living in Bulgaria, Romania, or even the white men forced to stay inside the Ukraine today while the women left freely?

And historically, are you talking about the millions upon millions of 18-25 year old white men who were brutally slaughtered by bullets and grenades during WW1 and WW2, having been forced into a warzone to fight?

Or the coal miners who died working in brutal conditions in order to provide for their family?

Did these white men “have it all” too?

I have a big problem with the selective way that feminists seem to view history.

And as for men “being abusive jerks” and such, do you think a shy, 18 year old man with social anxiety has ever been abusive to a woman, or mistreated anyone in anyway?

People need to be treated as individuals and not lumped in a catagory of “men”.

Having no sympathy for an 18-year-old guy, based on the actions of other, older men is totally unfair and wrong.